Tag-Archive for » Bernie Ecclestone «

Zoom Zoom: More Upheaval

Wednesday, May 13th, 2009 | Author:
My only shot at owning a Ferrari (Laura wont let me)

My only shot at owning a Ferrari (Laura won't let me)

Here’s an interesting question: Would F1 without the drama off the track be interesting all? I ask the question because the past three races have been complete snoozefests, only made interesting by the drama not involving cars racing on the track. During the Spanish GP last weekend, my brother and I counted two passes during the entire race. Two. It’s come to the point where the qualifying on Saturday is more exciting than the actual race on Sunday.

Off the track, however, the manoeuvres are coming fast and furious. The latest in the never-ending political hemming and hawing at the FIA involves some pretty serious threats: Ferrari, Renault, Toyota and Red Bull are all threatening to pull out of F1 if new regulations being imposed on the series for next season are not revoked. The regulations in question are huge in their implications. What the FIA has proposed (and in fact has put into effect for next season) is an “optional” budget cap on race teams. Those that adhere to the cap will be allowed greater technical freedom, and those that spend past the cap will have technical restrictions.

I’m of two minds on this. First, F1 is the peak of automobile racing. This is where car companies come to research and develop their leading-edge automotive technologies. When you limit the amount that a company can research and develop for their cars you are hindering their capabilities not only as a racing team, but as a car company. On the other hand, spending has become so obscene in F1 that only a few teams could realistically compete. Bringing a cap in would level the playing field and theoretically improve the on-track product, which has admittedly become quite stale.

As with most F1 political tussles these days, it comes down to a battle of wills between Max Mosley and Bernie Ecclestone. Mosley, the embattled FIA supremo is digging trenches and preparing for a pitched battle, according to this snippet from a Reuters article:

“Mosley said recently that he was locked in a power struggle that he intended to win.

‘The sport could survive without Ferrari,’ he said. ‘It would be very, very sad to lose Ferrari. It is the Italian national team.’”

In the same Reuters piece Bernie Ecclestone confirmed what we had all suspected for a long time, that he is totally in bed with Ferrari: “Formula One is Ferrari and Ferrari is Formula One, it’s just a marriage made in heaven”. Thanks for clearing that up, Bernie. Maybe he could set up a Middle-Eastern auto racing series featuring only Ferraris: that would be the natural conclusion of his every move in the past few years.

As an F1 fan, these types of battles are the only compelling storylines to watch. Getting up early on Sunday mornings sure isn’t doing it for me these days. Let’s keep a close eye on this one.

Zoom Zoom: Bah-rain Boh-ring

Monday, April 27th, 2009 | Author:

The Bahrain GP got off to one of the most exciting starts I can remember. There was passing, jostling, and more passing. Drivers jockeyed for position over the first couple of laps, highlighted by Jenson Button and Lewis Hamilton trading 3rd place a few times. For a few moments, it looked like were going to witness a race for the ages – then it got as bland as the desert backdrop.

It’s still refreshing to see Ferrari struggle and a new team dominate, as Brawn is doing by winning three of the first four races. But please allow me to indulge on getting a little something off my chest. Fuck You Bahrain. Fuck you and your desert track with 50,000 spectators being preferred for its petro-dollars over Montreal’s lush scenery and feverish fans. Fuck you for painting cutesy little colours onto the SAND that lines the track. You’re not fooling anyone. Buffalo N.Y., Joan Rivers and the Bahrain Grand Prix: three things you cannot “pretty up”, no matter how much money you throw at it. Fuck you Bahrain.

I really have nothing against Bahrain and its desert. I’m just bitter about Montreal having its F1 race revoked after 44 of the past 46 years because of unpaid ransom demands by Bernie the Pirate, only to be replaced by locales that have no F1 tradition or even much interest. Sometimes I cannot contain it. As Zach de la Rocha once so eloquently put it: “I’ll give you a dose but it could never come close to the rage built up inside of me”.

Congrats to Jenson Button, Sebastian Vettel and Jarno Trulli on their podium finishes. Word is that Ferrari will be upgrading their car significantly for the next race, two weeks from now in Barcelona. Can’t wait to see if they can pull it off. It will also be a great opportunity to wish Fernando Alonso as little luck as possible on his home track (Lola is going to go apeshit when she reads that last part).

Zoom Zoom: Play With Water, You Get Wet?

Monday, April 06th, 2009 | Author:

NASCAR fans who read this column will be forgiven for feeling smug this morning as I write of an F1 race that had to be stopped because of rain; only a month ago I took a shot at NASCAR for ending their crown jewel race due to a rainshower. What goes around…

The Malaysian GP was stopped with 32 of 56 scheduled laps to go. What made this particular red flag situation unacceptable is that F1′s brain trust had decided to push the start time of the race an hour later to better accommodate European television viewership. This was done despite the objections of local officials, who argued that at this time of year, at that time of day, Kuala Lumpur almost always receives a torrential downpour. I guess we notch this up as another feather in Bernie Ecclestone’s cap.

What we were left with was another win for Jenson Button, followed by Nick Heidfeld of BMW and Timo Glock of Toyota. If you don’t follow F1 closely, those are not household names. Ferrari once again was left pointless, and Lewis Hamilton of McLaren finished 7th (I wonder what rule FIA will invoke to strip of his points this week?). Because the race was stopped with less than 3/4 of the race finished, only half the usual points were awarded.

The saddest part of the whole situation is we had a great race going. There was a number of exciting battles on the circuit, notably a fight between Lewis Hamilton and Mark Weber that saw them switch position four or five times within a few laps. The threat of rain was making some teams lose their minds, as when Ferrari sent Kimi Raikonnen out on the track on “extreme wet” tires, even though not a drop had yet fallen. Three laps later, when the rain finally started coming down, the tires were shredded and he had to pit again. Good times.

Two races down in the calendar, and trends are starting to develop:

- Brawn GP is for real. Button qualified on the pole again, and Barrichello was fourth. Two straight wins for the team means they are the ones to beat until other teams find a way to improve their front wing, which is generally being credited for their quick start.

- Ferrari are hurting. Yes, I know they generally get out to a slow start, but this is different. They look terrible out there. If things don’t shape up soon, I predict heads are gonna roll.

- Williams-Toyota are fast (in practice). It looks like the car is quick, and Niko Rosberg is putting down some really fast times in practice and qualifying, but they don’t see to have the car where it needs to be to compete for the Championship. Don’t be surprised if they pull off a couple of wins, though.

- Lewis Hamilton is one of the best drivers in the world. That much is becoming clear this season. Sure he won a Championship last season, but this year he doesn’t have a car. Kovalainen isn’t even in the same galaxy when you look at what each driver is getting out of that “bagnole”.

The next stop is the Chinese GP on the weekend of April 17-19. Judging by the first two races, you don’t wat to miss it.

Zoom Zoom: More Politicking In F1

Thursday, April 02nd, 2009 | Author:

Let me set the stage for you on what happened at the end of the Malaysian GP: Robert Kubica and Sebastian Vettel are locked in a heated battle for second and third place on the podium with three laps to go. (In my view), Kubica is overly-aggressive and is at fault for causing both cars to wipe out, ending their race. A full-course yellow is then necessary and the race finishes under caution with Jensen Button coming first and Rubens Barichello coming second. Because of the crash, Jarno Trulli is now in third and Lewis Hamilton in fourth. This is where the shenanigans begin.

Depending on who you believe (shouldn’t there be video of this!?!), Trulli somehow ran off the track. Seeing this, Hamilton passed him. Not sure if he was allowed to do this, Hamilton sought advice from his team and they told him to let Trulli pass him again, which he did. After the race, McLaren Mercedes filed a protest stating that Trulli passed Lewis Hamilton under caution (a no-no), and should be awarded third place. The protest is accepted and their positions were officially swapped.

Today, however, the decision was reversed and Hamilton was stripped of all points earned in the race because either he or the team lied to stewards about what really happened. I’m still trying to wade through the reports to figure out what truly (Trulli?) happened, but even if McLaren tried to gain an advantage by stretching the truth in their telling of the story, isn’t stripping them of all points a little harsh?

And ask yourself this question in all seriousness: If you replace Hamilton with Felipe Massa of Ferrari in this situation, is the same judgment handed down?

Not only that, but Vettel was handed a 10 place grid penalty for his involvement in the Kubica crash. I’ve heard many opinions on this from experts and fans. At best, people thought it was a 50-50 blame share, a racing incident, and at worse it was Kubica’s fault (my stance). The stewards once again saw it completely differently. Again, no explanation.

This is what disgusts me about F1. There are no legislated penalties for issues like this – the penalties are handed down subjectively and without proper explanation or justification. It leaves the door open to all kind of conspiracy talk. F1 would do itself a favour by being consistent in its rulings. Alas, Bernie and Max are the ones running this circus.

Zoom Zoom: Australian GP

Monday, March 30th, 2009 | Author:

As I settled in yesterday morning to watch the Australian GP, as that beautiful sound of F1 cars buzzing about reached my ears, as the sights being beamed from Melbourne reached my screen, it dawned on me: F1 is not coming to Montreal this year. It just felt so wrong as that reality began the process of settling in. No Montreal F1. No Canadian GP. Heck, no North American race.

An incredibly bittersweet feeling sat in the pit of my stomach as I watched and listened. Excited that F1 was back, devastated as I realized there would be no trip to see Montreal transformed into a big car festival this summer.

But then, as I surfed the net and emerged from my week-long slumber, I found a ray of hope. Turns out money can’t buy you time, and the track being built in the United Arab Emirates is woefully behind schedule, and rumours were flying in Melbourne that Bernie would have to crawl back to the organizing committee of the Canadian GP to see if they could replace it with a race in November. This hasn’t happened yet, but how fantastic would that be? Oh, and I fully support the stance organizers in Montreal are taking, basically saying “If you want back in, you come back for the long haul”. That’s right. You wanted to pound us with your stick when you had the long end, Bernie? Time for some payback.

As usual, politics off the track were threatening to overshadow the action that actually matters. Other than the Montreal talk, there were also a number of teams lodging protests against Brawn GP, the team that replaced Honda in the field, and their interpretation of the rules governing the front wing of the car. As I previously posted, many new rules were being brought into effect this season with the hope of cutting costs and leveling the playing field. Word is, however, that Brawn’s offence is more against the “spirit” of the rule than any type of legality, so either the other teams will adapt or the FIA will clarify its rule: no sanctions are forthcoming against Brawn GP.

Whatever they did to that front wing, it worked! Brawn GP, using a Mercedes engine, were 1-2 in qualifying and 1-2 in the race. It was only the third time that a new entry to F1 has won the race. Jenson Button ended up beating Rubens Barrichello at the finish, and Lewis Hamilton in his McLaren Mercedes took third spot despite being denied his spot on the podium as the stewards tried to figure out how Jarno Trulli passed him under caution three laps from the finish. Ferrari were out of the points (sad, I know), and whatever wishes the FIA had for leveling the playing field, they achieved. We’ll just have to see how things play out over the course of the season.

One complaint I had is despite all these rule changes promising more competition and more battles on track, the latter did not materialize. Only a few times during the race did we see true battles (and unfortunately the best one was aborted when Robert Kubica foolishly tried to run Sebastian Vettel off the track with three laps to go), and if I’m not mistaken the lead never changed hands. I don’t hide my disdain for NASCAR, but they’ve got us beat in terms of leader changes and wondering who will come out on top.

But this day belonged to Ross Brawn, the architect of this new F1 team. He was the genius who teamed up with Michael Schumacher at Benetton and Ferrari, and moved to Honda once Schumi retired. Forced to build a team within a few months after Honda pulled out, he has assembled a winner. Such last minute was this endeavour that they only announced their title sponsor shortly before qualifying on Saturday. Richard Branson is getting into the F1 game by making Virgin the eye candy on these un-sexy cars (pictured, right). Call me brainwashed, but there’s just something odd about seeing a race car that isn’t plastered with sponsor liveries . Something tells me that after this weekend, sponsorship money will come rolling in. Such is the life of winners.

Zoom Zoom: Another Day, Another Blunder

Tuesday, March 17th, 2009 | Author:

Fresh off yesterday’s post announcing my tepid enthusiasm regarding the upcoming Formula 1 season, Bernie Ecclestone dropped another bomb on racing fans.

It appears Bernie thought that a points system didn’t work. It appears he somehow thought that of all the things ailing F1, the way a champion is determined is what deserved his attention. Now, whichever driver wins the most races wins the Championship.

I wonder if it’s just a coincidence that a Ferrari driver would have won the Championship had this rule been in effect last year? Having failed in all his attempts to foil Lewis Hamilton and McLaren last season, he will try to re-write the record books going forward. Of note: 13 past champions would not have won the championship if these rules had been in effect.

How are we to measure their accomplishments now? Have we empowered revisionists to claim: “Oh, he wasn’t really a Champion, that’s from the old era’s rules”? Bernie has essentially opened the door to a “win at all costs” mentality that could lead to erratic teams and drivers winning the Championship in a best case scenario. Worst-case scenario? Drivers become dangerous to protect their place at the front of the pack.
Since there are 17 races this season, it is now a first past the poll system where 9 wins guarantees the Championship. And so if we get to round 13, the Italian GP, with a driver winning his 9th race – the season is over. No need to get up on Sunday morning anymore. And do you think teams will compete as hard as they can once a Champion is crowned in mid-season? Fat chance. Teams, including the Champion’s team, will protect their assets, save on costs and start preparing for the following season.
One thing sports fans demand is consistency. Consistency in rules is the bedrock on which we can evaluate our current heroes against the annals of history. Is Lewis Hamilton as good as Ayrton Senna? Michael Schumacher or Jackie Stewart? It just got tougher to tell. You can change the rules governing the size of your rear wing and substitute slicks for grooved tires, but once you start messing with the barometer with which we crown our Champions, that’s where we get ourselves in trouble.

Zoom Zoom: I Suck at Boycotts

Monday, March 16th, 2009 | Author:

Here I was, all set to boycott F1 this year after Bernie Ecclestone yanked the series out of North America completely, choosing some oil-rich country with lots of money-filled envelopes over the 30-year loyalty of the Canadian GP. That, and the continuing bias towards Ferrari that the organizers have clearly demonstrated over recent years had me completely set on turning my back on this sport, which I love.

To quote Michael Corleone from the Godfather, Part 3: “Just when I thought I was out…they pull me back in.” My brother Mathieu was the culprit this time around, courtesy of this informative video from Red Bull Racing:

The changes coming into play this season, which become mandatory in 2010, are very intriguing. This article about BMW is an indicator that we’re in for an interesting season.